Resource

This thesis examines the emergence of the professional architect in the provinces of
eighteenth-century Britain, drawing upon new research into the career of William
Newton (1730-1798) of Newcastle upon Tyne. Section I assesses the growth of
professionalism, identifying the criteria that distinguished professions from other
occupations and their presence in architectural practitioners. It contrasts historians’
emphasis upon innovative designs by artist-architects, such as Sir John Vanbrugh and
Robert Adam, with their absence from the realisation of their designs. Clients had to
employ capable building craftsmen to supervise construction and this was an
opportunity for an alternative practitioner to emerge, the builder-architect exemplified
by Newton, offering clients proven practical experience, frequent supervision, peer
group recommendation and financial responsibility. Patronage networks were a critical
factor in securing commissions for provincial builder-architects, demonstrated here by a
reconstruction of Newton’s connections to the north-east élite. Section II reveals that the
coal-based north-east economy sustained architectural expenditure, despite national
fluctuations. A major proposal of this thesis is that, contrary to Borsay’s theory of an
‘English urban renaissance’, north-east towns showed continuity and slow development.
Instead, expenditure was focused upon élite social spaces and industrial infrastructure,
and by the extensive repurposing of the hinterlands around towns. This latter
development constituted a ‘rural renaissance’ as commercial wealth created country
estates for controlled access to social pursuits by élite families. Section III examines the
designs of architects practising in north-east England during the eighteenth century,
proposing that the martial history and cultural traditions of the region sustained the
appeal of castellated and Roman architecture (as interpreted in the publications of
Andrea Palladio) among its architectural patrons. The thesis concludes that concentration upon London-based artist-architects has obscured the contribution to British architecture of provincial builder-architects and the varied cultural aspirations of
their clients.